The Equals Zero Christmas Special: eNanoHerpyBike; or How to Hack Your Cheap 5V BEC to be a 12V DC/DC unit

Hey everyone! It’s time for another “Did I say later… I mean like now“! Recall this from a few weeks ago:


Going above, beyond, and way further on the highway to collect dumb shit than ever before?

I decided that it was so simple and required so little fabrication that I might as well do it in the post-semester downtime when the students all go home continue to use the shop for their own derpy projects, but luckily they don’t involve my oversight as much. It also presented me with an opportunity to finally use one of the One Thousand Hobbyking Amps ESCs, and I got to try the “mechanical waterjet” on aluminum to test out how well it was able to perform; even though it’s not really meant for that.

So here’s what it is.

Here it is on the dissection table in preparation for removing the existing powertrain.

What it comes with:

  • 12v lead acid battery
  • “80W” generic scooter motor – it metered 0.18 ohms, which means this motor could actually push quite some power. I couldn’t find these on sale anywhere, so they might have been a one-off made for this vehicle by Razor by Unite Motor (which makes OEM motors for Razor)
  • On-or-off controller that was really your finger switch pulsing a relay. Finger-PWM!
  • Roughly 8.5:1 reduction, belt drive. I found this impressive since it means I could easily make use of it for sensorless drive, to which a high gear ratio is crucial.

What it’ll get:

  • 25.9v (7s) lithium battery, from my Nuclear Arsenal
  • Hobbyking “200a” controller. I decided to start with the “Birdie” model.
  • A left over T600-880 motor. It was way too fast for the application, but is the closest hardware direct swap!

The big plastic belt cover comes off to reveal the driveline mechanics. They put quite a lot of engineering effort into these, so I’m sad that these things are no longer being sold. An adjustable sliding motor mount and a real spring-loaded belt tensioner, commanding a quite unconventional 14mm wide 3mm HTD belt (size 549-3M-14). Typical 3mm belts are only 12mm wide. I was only about to find the belts listed specifically for this vehicle, so again it might be a dedicated thing for Razor.

I designed a quick mounting plate that adapts the T600’s 25mm bolt pattern to the 56mm pattern of the original motor:

I was going to lob it at someone in MITERS to sneak onto one of the waterjet cutters, but somehow this felt immoral. One thing I had been itching to try was cutting metal on our Shopbot PRS Alpha. It’s something which has been done in limited amounts and generally very slowly, often on thin material. The Shopbots aren’t metalcutting machines by design – their construction is lightweight aluminum extrusions and little wheel guides on steel rails. This doesn’t lend itself to maximum rigidity or vibration damping.

Here’s where I found out that our machine has a bit of head backlash- look at the oval flattening of the holes. I guess I’ll have to dial it out now.

I drilled and screwed a spare 1/8″ plate onto our cutting bed and sprinkled the area in cutting fluid to keep the cut cool. Another reason why I’m not about to buy aluminum in 4 x 8 foot plates is the lack of a coolant system and chip extraction system – the vacuum next to it isn’t gonna do that for you.  If this becomes a more common practice, I might try to invest in a standalone mist cooler, which doesn’t make a huge lake of coolant and delivers just enough to keep the bit clean and cut area lubricated (Example)

Using a feed and speed calculator, I came up with a conservative feed rate and spindle speed assuming 0.001″ of cut per tooth – pretty light. Using an 1/8″ carbide endmill, I was going to run it at 30 inches per minute at 10,000 RPM.

It broke pretty much instantly.

I’m going to guess that the machine just can’t absorb that level of force and not vibrate, which is weird, but when your bit is brittle and tiny, even a small amount of vibration will destroy it. I began at 50% of that speed (15 IPM) and gradually put it back up to 20. In the picture of the two parts, the left was done at 20IPM and the right at 15IPM, and the right one exhibits better surface finish.

I suspect dialing out the backlash and tightening the axis rollers more will help it, but it seems that slow and steady with a “one flute” cutter wins – check out the work by this crew.

Anyways, the “is this insane” part of the mission is complete with a satisfactory part, so I’m good for now.

The adapter plate and motor installed!

To make an adapter for the 6mm D-flat shaft of the motor to the 8mm D-flat shaft of the pulley bore, I turned a piece of aluminum tubing to a 1mm wall, cut off an arc with a Dremel tool to make it the rough proper circumferential length, and then mashed the pulley and motor and itself together on an arbor press. The 1mm tubing section cold forged into the shape of a D-flat that bridged motor and pulley, and all was good!

I wouldn’t send it into space, but I would totally send it down the hallway.

The slot is to pass the pre-assembled motor and pulley through, because the pulley flange was too large to fit between the mounting holes, and the arbor press installation was pretty much a one-shot thing.

A better view of the motor installation, with the same M4 screws it came with.

Moving onto electronics:

I whipped up this really quick housing to be made from on-hand high density fiberboard. It served two purposes – first, I hate zip tying electronics together (and explicitly ban it in 2.00gokart!), and I was going to actively fan cool the controller, so it needed a “wind tunnel” of sorts. This thing hangs down on the center frame tube and is secured by some circular sectors with matching holes. The fan is mounted to the left (the front), and the controller sticks out the rear. I designed it to cradle the controller by the output wires.

For signal processing, I brutally butchered a small servo tester – cut the LEDs off, cut the mode button off, and cut the potentiometer off. I only used a soldering iron to clear the potentiometer’s pin holes to add my own 3 pin cable. The potentiometer’s voltage output is to be substituted with a typical small EV throttle (example).

These little testers swing from about 900 to 2100us with the pot’s 0-5v output, so with a typical Hall sensor throttle’s 1-4v output, I’m still in a reasonable range to interface with the R/C controller. This is the quickest way to get set up with an R/C power system – more details can be found, of course, in Scooter Power Systems.

The ESCs I got in the Hobbyking vivisection post are all “Opto”, meaning they do not supply power to the receiver and they take signal in through an optocoupler (hence the name).

Well, first off, there’s no optocoupler – in Hobbyking language, these “Opto” ESCs just have all the parts for an onboard 5v power supply taken out for cost reduction.

Smart. Well, there’s always a very small 5V supply – the microcontroller’s own power regulator. It’s too small to run any servos or bright LEDs, but if you only need a few more mA to run said servo tester, then it’s an easy wire jump from the 5V regulator to the red wire of the servo signal cable! In these applications, the regulator is already very heavily stressed (they’re not supposed to be dropping 20+v on their own), so a small auxiliary micro is about the most that can be gotten from it.

Now, to be fair, it’s not true for all of them – most of the higher value controllers, such as my eternal favorite the 100A Sentilon, have legitimate optocoupled signal inputs and isolated grounds. For high current applications, it can greatly reduce noise glitching.

I bunched the old heat sink back on, in a less precarious location (recall that they ship with the heat sinks touching the output solder blobs), and threw a new heat shrink shell around it.

This leftover 4400mAh  7S Thunder Power battery from the DERPA robot fit perfectly in the 12V lead acid tray. It was so perfect that I just used some Velcro cinching straps (not zip ties – never, ever zip tie your lipos) and it sort of hangs out there, oblivious to all that is about to occur.

I needed a 12v rail to drive the cooling fan, which was not going to tolerate 26+ volts straight from the battery. I decided to check if my collection of cheap HV 5 volt BECs was hackable to yield 12v. The answer is yes, and I’ll keep it as a separate section under Beyond Unboxing, so for now, this is the 12v DC to DC converter!

The electronics box was laser-cut from 1/8″ and 3/16″ high density particleboard. This stuff is actually reasonably strong and water-resistant – not like Ikeaboard. I am still on the hunt for a high strength laser-cuttable plastic that isn’t either terribly messy (ABS, PETG) or expensive (Delrin). Or really soft and plushy (Polyethylene). For now, wood was fast and someone left a plate of it without their name anywhere, so it automatically becomes state property.

Here’s where the controller sits.

The 12v DC-DC module and servo tester have been added. That fan is a 40mm harvested server fan – the ones that scream at 10,000+ RPM to move the same air as a big computer case fan, but it’s a server in a room by itself and flatness is more important than being quiet. I whipped up an adapter block and had it 3D printed while the rest of the wiring happened.

A better shot of the fan, as well as a view of the master switching. The male Deans connector is where I jack in the battery; the vehicle is turned on using the “Georgia Tech Switch” that I now use on almost everything that doesn’t matter. It’s also known as a ‘removable link’.

A shot of the completed vehicle! I used left over wiring twizzlers spiral loom from the Electric Vehicle Team to keep the wire bundles neat.

First impressions: It’s very menacing wheels-up when you gun it, but on the ground is a different story. Remember how I said the motor is “too fast”? Basically, the theoretical max speed for this design is 61mph:

  • 880 RPM/V at 25V (assuming some loss in the system) to yield 22000 RPM
  • Reduced 8.5:1 to yield 2588 RPM at the wheel
  • with an 8″ wheel, that results in a ground speed of 61.5MPH

That’s an impressive number to throw around to the uninitiated, but what it means is that at any speed under half of that – or about 30mph – the motor is dissipating more watts in heat than it is giving you in mechanical watts of ass-haul. So, in other words, this thing just pulled 200+ amps and didn’t do that much. The takeoff was still extremely strong, but at the expense of all the wires and the battery being hot within a minute. The controller is only surviving due to forced air cooling.

Despite all this, I rode it home and back a few times for sheer shits. I might even say I love it more than Melonscooter, since it’s so light and nimble. I just had to have a very, very sensitive throttle finger since if I accidentally gunned it, it’s not going to take off without me, but just light on fire.

This stopped being funny within a few hours. I decided that nobody else was ever going to be able to experience the joy of this thing since it would self-eat so easily. And self-eat it did – for some reason, one day Jamison was taking a spin and it made a popping noise and stopped working.

Whoops. Well, it’s time to “downgrade” the motor while I’m at it:

I spent a while on Hobbykong searching for a replacement motor. I decided to try and get the speed down to about 30mph tops – which I assure you is plenty fast enough. I had to juggle which motors were in stock with how much work I wanted to do to replace the shaft (since almost all of these small outrunners have 6mm shafts), with which ones actually had my required RPM/V.

I settled on this 700-class heli motor with 500 RPM/V. It would yield a “max power speed” of 16mph, so you could actually stand a chance at blitzing down the hallway and be able to kill yourself instantly at the end. I also trade an unrealistic top speed for more useable launching torque.

I wanted to do away with the irritating forged sleeve adapter. I had left over 8mm precision shafting, so I turned this replacement shaft on tinylathe and made retaining ring grooves on the right end to keep the pulley on without a set screw (It came with a snap ring on the original motor). The dimensions are otherwise on-the-fly measured directly from the heli motor.

The new motor installation was easy; it shared the same bolt holes as the T600. I replaced the burnt Birdie with the Red Brick.

This thing now really hauls – I can legitimately hand it to someone and have them throw themselves off without potentially destroying anything. Not to mention that it somehow became 100% practical too! The suspension and pneumatic tires means it’s actually very smooth in handling bumps, and a little exciting in acceleration since it compresses and you are not sure if it will keep compressing until you land on your head. Just don’t try to stop. It has 1 brake, in the rear, and your center of gravity makes it lock up if you are even thinking of stopping.

eNanoHerpyBike (because it’s electric and smaller than Herpybike to the left) is up for some test video soon, whenever it stops being disgusting outside. I do have some hallway footage, but this really needs space.

That’s all build-report wise. I said, super simple and minimal fabrication. I’m truly sad that these things are now getting rare.

Beyond Unboxing: Turning Cheap BECs into 12V DC/DC units

Now a little more about the BEC hack. This falls under the category of “you might find this useful if you already have $part but want to do this thing with it”.

You can buy dedicated 12V DC/DC converters for your contraption, but they’re either fairly expensive for the job ($30-100+ dollars) or are a fixed, narrow voltage input and output for industrial use. Good quality R/C BEC (Battery Eliminator Circuit – originally for pilots who didn’t want the extra weight of a receiver battery) are usually wide-range input switching converters, but they’re tuned for 5V.

Update: For thoroughness, and at reader suggestion, here are some examples of where you might be able to get DC/DC converters:

Current Logic is one place I’ve gone to frequently for commercial/industrial modules.

End update!

But since they cost $4-5, a little bit of legwork can turn them into 12V units which will often put out more than enough current – 3 to 5 amps – to run gaudy lighting or auxiliary systems.

I have a pile of these inexpensive 8-40v things specifically for robots and vehicles, so I decided to tear one apart and see which resistor I need to jump to get the output voltage to change.

Inside almost all of these, it’s just a small switching regulator chip, similar to the LM2576 – the design has been genericized to hell and back. This one is by “XL Semiconductor“.

The circuit is pretty much exactly the application note:

Essentially, the converter doesn’t actually “know” what voltage you want it to output. It only decides if the voltage at its feedback pin, measured through the divider R2 and R2, is higher or lower than an internal reference voltage (usually 1.23V). If it’s higher, it’ll lower its output duty cycle percentage to compensate, and if lower, it’ll raise the duty cycle. This is a brick simple, classic DC/DC buck converter.

The feedback circuit is right here. The two resistors that make up the main feedback network are R4 and R2 (the small resistor horizontally displaced to R3’s left).

In this application, R4 is what the schematic above calls “R1” (the lower half of the divider), and R2 is… well, R2.

R2 is designated 49B (3.16K) and R4 is 01B (1.00K).  Small SM resistors use some god-awful lookup code instead of a numeric ones – here’s a table of them. Let’s see what voltage this yields:

Vout = 1.23v * (1 + (3160 / 1000)) = 5.11V

The way it selects 5v or 6v is by jumping R3 on the board in parallel with R4, reducing the effective value of the low side of the resistor divider,and causing the regulator to sense an artificially low voltage. So it tries to make up for the deficiency by outputting a higher one. The resistor that gets jacked in by the jumper is a 472, or 4700 ohms (4.7K). This results in a net low side resistance of 1.0K || 4.7K, or 824 ohms.

Vout = 1.23v * (1 + (3160 / 824)) = 5.95V

And that’s how you get 6V.

So if I wanted 12 volts, I can do one of two things:

  • Keep lowering the low-side resistance value (lesser R1 in the example schematic, or lesser R4 on this board)
  • Raise the high-side resistance value (make R2 larger).

To do the former, I would need a R1 (slash R4) of:

R1 = R2 / ((Vout/Vref) – 1) = 3160 / ((12.0 / 1.23) – 1) = 360 ohms

To do the latter, I would need an R2 of:

R2 = 1000 * ((12.0 / 1.23) – 1) = 8756 ohms

Now, most of these datasheets recommend keeping R1 to 1-10K ohms for best stability, so the second option is more palatable. I could use a 9.1K resistor in place of the R2 on the board to get about 12.4 volts.

I didn’t have a 9.1K resistor of any kind. And then, only SMT resistors of the utterly incorrect size and value, a 1206 package (the board uses 0603 package, half the dimensions in every way!).

So I’ll just glob it on sideways. Whatever.

This 10K resistor nets me a extra volt or so:

Whatever ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

What is this, science?!

If I put the 5V-6v jumper into the “6v” position, the voltage becomes about 14.8 volts. In other words, damn perfect for charging a 12V auxiliary battery in constant voltage mode. These things automatically enter constant current if the current load exceeds 5 amps, but they heat up and can be damaged quickly. So, float charge only.

Anyhow, I’m doubtful of the utility of this hack for most hobbyists because it requires SMT surgery. Because the external jumper only adds a different resistor, there’s no Clever Jump It With a Different Resistor hack possible – it’ll need to bypass the internal R to ground to get it done. Adding more resistance to the path will make the voltage differential lower.

To avoid SMT work (trust me, it’s not that bad: sharp, clean tip, and a tweezer), you could solder a regular 1/8 watt small resistor directly to Pin 4 of the chip, the feedback circuit, and just solder blob away the smaller feedback resistors.

Regardless, this is presented in the interest of aiding anyone else who might think of this bad idea in their own quest. I’m certainly ordering a bucket more of these things – I can’t believe I didn’t think of this until now.

Beyond Unboxing, Chibi-Mikuvan Miscellaneous Engineering Edition: Inside a 9-Inch Angle Grinder Gearbox; Hobbyking T20 Inrunner Motor

This post will wrap up some more of the components I’m aiming to incorporate into this build. Recall that part of the mission of Chibi-Mikuvan is to use a jumble unconventional parts together as a technology demonstrator of sorts, so I’m exposing the inner workings of a handful of potential part sources not typically seen in public together Previously, I dove into the Motor Controller of 1000 Cool Story Bro Amps, then the Dramatically Over-Engineered Batteries of Doom. This time, the teardowns aren’t as epic or novel, but as usual I figured the more pictures of things, the better. The story now moves to the drivetrain parts; in particular, one way to get a compact 3:1 or 4:1 reduction, and then a few pokes inside the motor I settled on using.

First up:

cheap angle grinder gearboxes

Angle grinders are three things: A way to really quickly embed little abrasive rocks into your face, a fast and powerful motor, a high-speed right angle gear drive, and a doubly-supported output spindle that usually even comes with a little nut to attach deadly centrifugal grenades to. In the past, I’ve personally seen them used on some Battlebots in a weapon application for overhead bar spinners in the “sublight” weight classes (12 and 30 pounds). At one point during my early days, I had the parts of 4 or 5 cheap Chinese angle grinders floating around my combination bedroom & machine shop.


I never said I was smart, that’s just what everyone else says… (Picture from 2004)

Angle grinders tend to also come in two major classes: For parts, or to be used as tools. I’m concentrating on the former here – the so-called “Harbor Freight-class” angle grinders that typically sell new for $20-30, if not even less on discount.


Some time featuring such things as “noise reducing gears”.  (Picture from 2004)

Okay, so I literally haven’t seen a single plastic geared one since then, but the precedent is set!

These days, I assume the Chinese gear-hobbing industry is better established. You can even buy individual grinder gears on eBay nowadays, if you want to build your own housing, and by far they are the cheapest way to get a right angle drive; however, like repurposing car parts, they aren’t sold by tooth counts and equivalent diametrical pitches, but exact model replacements. So to use them, you’d need to do a bit of ‘shotgun designing’. You can even use them to make differentials like God intended. Bear in mind that the steel quality for most of these gears is likely a little on the shady side – I recall being able to machine them easily using my primitive garage tools, so the steel is most likely a low or unhardened medium carbon type.

I specifically picked these out of the back aisles of my mental design warehouse because I was in need of a way to make a very high gear ratio, on the order of 20:1, in a small space and without being too expensive. Spur gears were essentially out of the question right away due to price, even Andymark gears, since at least 3 stages would have been needed. Chain drive was a little more feasible, but still, the cost of support materials like the bearings and shafting to form the intermediate stages was high. I tried to think of clever ways to get a high reduction without causing the material cost to exceed the PPPRS $500 threshold.

And then it hit me! Something I forgot about for many years now seemed like the obvious strategy. I began the eBay hunt and tried to cross-correlate different angle grinder models with their gear tooth counts, but what I found about the smaller 4 to 5 inch disc grinder size was that their ratios were really low (2.5 or 3:1, or thereabouts) because the torque levels needed to drive a small grinding disc were not that much. Ben’s differential build above shows a pretty typical 4 to 5 inch class gearset. This wasn’t going to be sufficient for a first stage, since I was constrained by wheel and sprocket size to no more than roughly 5:1 in the second.

I decided to try a different method of finding out what gears were in which size grinder: Going to my local Harbor Freight and literally taking apart their display models in the aisle, with a screwdriver sourced from their hand tools aisle. The manager was nonplussed, but backed down after I explained that I was actually doing an engineering study and would buy the display model that fit my needs. Sadly, I didn’t have any pictures from this excursion.

I got the 69085 9″ grinder display model (an older version; all of the boxed ones were this new gearbox design) for $30 after some explanation, without any of the frills. My hunch settled on the 7″ through 9″ sizes having bigger gear ratios because the torque needed to swing such a large disc combined with the motors not being that much larger across pointed towards it. So let’s see how this looks inside.

Four longitudinal case screws and four dorsal gearbox screws later, the whole thing sort of falls apart. The motor itself is a hefty universal motor – a brushed DC series-wound motor with laminated stator to enable it to run on AC with less losses.

In my opinion, this motor can be rewound to run effectively at 24-36 volts just by replacing the many turns of thin wire on the stator with a few turns of very fat wire. The stator coils measured 2 ohms, so the stall current of the motor is quite low if used stock at that voltage. The armature resistance was around 0.25 ohms – high, but not the end of the world, and you can find low voltage motors that have a higher resistance easily. Maybe I should just do this instead!

The gearing is already starting to look promising.

The pinion is only retained by a nut on the end of the motor shaft, and as I found out, there’s no other power transmission medium in it except the torque of that nut. To remove the nut, I stuck the rotor in a vise and uncranked it with the appropriate sized wrench. Then, a little rubber mallet coaxing of the gearbox housing popped the shaft out of the gear and input bearing.

Here’s the gearset! A solid 49:12 reduction, or 4.083:1. Why 49 instead of 48? It’s so the teeth wear more evenly. The greatest common divisor of 12 and 49 is 1, and the least common multiple is 588, their products. Not only does this mean that it will take 588 turns instead of 4 for the same two teeth on pinion and gear to meet again, but it also disturbs any potential 4:1 mechanical resonances and harmonics that can pop up, contributing to smoothness.

The gear pitch is somewhere around module 1.5 (or about 16 pitch). The little gear has a plain 10mm more, and the big gear has a 15mm bore.

The output gear is retained axially by a single snap ring (which makes me feel really good about hanging a giant grinding disc off it, I’ll say). Rotation is ensured by a 4mm thick woodruff key. This is the same as the little grinders, just more metal.

Short of machining a custom housing, the most useful form of angle grinder gears is inside the angle grinder gearbox itself. The idea that I settled on is to machine a 10mm shaft that has a standard metric keyway cut into the end, broaching the small gear with that size key to make for a positive power transmission coupling. I’ll retain the threads on the end to lock the pinion in place axially. The nice thing about the pinion is that the right spacing relative to the output gear is attained just by running it against the input bearing – a good move for repeatability.

I’ll probably purchase hardened woodruff keys for both sides because I’m inclined to believe the ones that are included are very soft steel; at least, the “file test” made a huge divot in the output side one, which is the most likely to shear.

I made a ‘important dimensions only’ model of the gearbox for use in the design – it will be released once I validate it.

Full disclosure: All the bodywork on Mikuvan has involved a 4.5″ Harbor Freight angle grinder. It works just fine.

the unnecessarily large inrunner that will beast into it

There’s some pictures that just shouldn’t exist. For instance, this:

No, not the Moxie, but the inrunner that’s almost as big as it. Disclaimer: I have no clue what Moxie Cola is; this was given to me by someone, and I’ve actually been too scared to open it.

That motor is the Aquastar T20, a “1/5 scale” class inrunner for boats. So, I don’t understand the 1/5 scale R/C vehicle class in much the same way I don’t understand model airplane scales that are indicated in percent, like 33% or something. To me, when a radio controlled model gets that big, why don’t you just fucking get in and drive it yourself? A 1/5 scale model car is already a go-kart!

I typically advise people to stay away from inrunners because of their tendency towards extremely high speed (high Kv, or RPMs/volt) and consequently lower torque than an equivalently sized inrunner due to the smaller rotor size. It’s not as optimal a setup for small vehicles, in my opinion – that, and they are far harder to append Hall sensors to unless they already come with it.  However, when they get ridiculously sized, it’s a different story.  This motor is just slow enough that you can build a rideable vehicle using the Burnoutchibi principle: running a fast motor with a very high gear ratio to divide down your own apparent mass, and using a high capacity R/C controller instead of a dedicated EV controller.

This is where my number of 20:1, previously mentioned, came from. With the motor’s wye-terminated speed of 730 RPM/V and running the 28.8v system described previously, it works out to about 21,000 RPM, which isn’t far from what the angle grinder motor would have made anyway. Geared 4.08:1 and then 5:1 externally, the output speed at the wheel is theoretically 26mph. That’s just in “gear 1”.

One of the major reasons I selected this motor, besides straight up motor pen0r (that’s a technical term), is because it can be externally terminated in Y (wye, star) or Delta. The difference is how the windings interact with each other inside the motor – in a motor power system that is otherwise the exact same except for the type of termination, the Y-terminated motor spins 1.7 times slower (actually √3) with 1.7 times more torque. The science of it is more complex and has to do with the windings being placed in series in the Y termination, among other factors (see Mevey Ch. 2 for the rundown). My hub motor instructable of yore assumes you wind in Y.

This means that Chibi-Mikuvan could have two electrical ‘gears’, to contrast with Burnoutchibi’s two mechanical gears. Switching between the terminations without actually pulling wires means I’ll need an additional multipole switch or contactor rig to splice phases and connections. I have a few designs for this, and I’ll also post those once they’re validated. The hypothetical top speed in ‘Delta gear’, as compared to “Y gear”, is around 40mph, though realistically it will be less due to the nonlinear effects of wind resistance. I haven’t really thought about anything going that fast since the LOLrioKart days.

Let’s crack this motor apart:

Well, that was easy. Six faceplate screws and the rotor pops right out after some tugging. This is a 4-pole, 3-phase, 12-slot (or tooth) motor – most inrunner motors are build to be integer-slot like this.

This motor has a shorter rotor than what the can would indicate, with the extra space taken up by a spacer bushing. This is because the Hobbyking version is actually the smaller one. Elsewhere, this motor is called the “X520”, and yes, they make a longer one called the X524 (example 1, example 2, example 3… in case they vanish one by one), if you need an EVEN BIGGER MOTOR PEN0R (that’s a technical term).

The stator windings are very cleanly done up, though they don’t seem to be lacquer-coated for heat resistance. In most industrial motors, they dunk the whole stator in a resin that seeps into the windings and helps secure them at high temperatures and prevents the magnet wires’ enamel coating from coming apart. The whole wound stator seems to be mashed into the can, and that red heavy paper layer is presumably there to prevent it from being mashed too much.

I tried my best to pull the rear cover of the motor off, but the bullet connectors are very tightly press-fit into those plastic pass-throughs. Furthermore, the stator itself is also pressed into the can, so it wouldn’t have done much good. This was as good of a picture as I could get of the distal end of the motor can. You can just barely see where the terminations are brought out and soldered into the bullets.

The rotor length is 50mm…

…and the rotor diameter across the magnets is 27.8mm. The 4 magnets are wrapped in some kind of resin impregnated fiber. Now, it claims to be Kevlar, but I vote dental floss.

The boat variant of the motor has a water jacket, which I think will aid greatly in continuous power dissipation. It’s a very simple ring type one, with no internal turbulation devices or flow channels, so its effectiveness might be limited in comparison to a more rigorously designed one, but the tube structure is easy to make. My only beef is that the inlets are too small to use with regular PC water cooling equipment. The nozzles are 1/8″ ID barb fittings, so 1/8″ silicone or PVC tubing is the best you can do, but most PC stuff is 8mm or even 10mm. I haven’t designed or even thought about parts for the water cooling loop, but it’s something I do want to incorporate because inrunners seem to love to run hot.

The motor has a flatted 8mm shaft, but I almost wish it didn’t, since a flatted shaft makes it more difficult to use a collet or friction grip system to transmit power. I suppose for the application these are intended for, the flat is welcome, but my shaft coupler to run this into the angle grinder gearbox is a simple collet-like system identical to what I keep putting on my 3d printers and battlebots. I call it the “ninja coupling”. I also have just a bad impression of flats coming with my motors because of the nightmare that was aligning the collets on old Deathcopter’s ducted fans – a combination of poor quality collets and the flats on the motors meant that balancing the damn things was basically a crapshoot. In this case, a sturdy and well constrained motor mount would prevent that.

That does it for these parts! The only thing left to do is the Chibi-Mikuvan global engineering update itself, and that will come in due time; plus, I have some update for BurnoutChibi. So now it’s time for….

daily van bro.

I often have to avoid main thoroughfares and their associated never-ending traffic by ‘leaking’ through neighborhood blocks and side streets, where I have a vague sense of where I need to get and just navigate ad-hoc, re-orienting every once in a while by trying to find the Prudential Center. This has shown me a good chunk of the vehicular underbelly of the area, like when you lift up a rock in the woods and about 80 different species of bugs and small mammals all scatter. One day, I found this quite lovely Dodge A100. Along with the Chevrolet G vans, and Ford Econoline gen1, it was part of the American trio of derpy vans from the 1960s.

Maybe these should all be on my hit list too – it’s like Pokemon #800-951 (they’re up to that many now, right?)

Another potent candidate for Vans Next To Things! Here’s a great size comparison – even the “compact vans” were still bigger (which is weird, since Mikuvan is larger than a Greenbrier?)

Incidentally, right up until 2009, you could purchase a new 3rd generation Mitsubishi Delica in Mexico as the “Dodge Van 1000”.

Y’know, I really, really think one of the reasons cab-over vans never caught on in the U.S. was because we kept giving them names like “Van”, or “Van”, or “Van”, or the like. Would you buy that shit? No, but I would totally buy the SUZUKI EVERY JOYPOP TURBO. Or, since we’re American and macho here, the FORD BEASTMASTER GREAT ADVENTURER SRT, perhaps?

Either way, I know what I’m doing if I ever need parts on a greater scale…