Archive for April, 2010

 

Deathblades: A Little Bit of Motor Work

Apr 30, 2010 in Project Build Reports, RazErBlades

Look! It’s a Deathblade!

… or not. But this most excellent screenshot gives an idea of what the final product should look like – hopefully a little more 3-dimensional.

I’ve decided to condense the research and development that I have completed so far about small hub motors, refine it, and present it at this year’s de Florez Award Competition, hosted by the MechE department. The theme will be personal electric vehicle (PEV) propulsion and DIY conversion. Thus, my sudden attention to the Deathblades. While it’s unlikely I’ll have a whole power unit running by next week (and this is certainly better for my health), I at least want one on static display.

Anyway, you can’t have a Deathblade without hub motors. I decided to use the slightly scaled RazEr motor design because I already “knew” how to make one. The whole “can change a tire without taking apart the whole motor” feature is also desirable. Before starting, however, I went and simplified the design even further by changing the way the wire exits the motor.

The previous shaft involved drilling holes at an angle to pass the wires out. While this would be a better arrangement from a strain relief perspective, I didn’t want to have to put up with yet another machine setup. So the design was reduced to a slot meeting an axially drilled hole.

This is actually a design that I wanted to try on RazEr when I have to replace the existing motor, but it seems the Deathblades will get it first.

I ordered the material for these motors about a month ago, and they have been sitting on the stuff pile since then. Likeall my motors, I start with a giant steel pipe and cut it down to bite-sized chunks.

The pipe had to have an OD greater than the largest motor OD, which was the fixed wheel retaining flange, and also a bore smaller than the magnet ring design diameter. I chose 2.75″ OD x 2″ ID tubing – that’s a solid 3/8″ wall. Clearly not all of it will be used…

Leap of faith!

Here’s the protoform magnet ring/outer case. Protoform because it does not yet have holes drilled for the removable side plate. There are plenty of pictures of me building wheelmotors on the site already, so I’ll skip the cut-by-cut commentary for now.

I elected to beat the steel into submission using the meatiest lathe in my general vicinity at the time, which was the auto shop’s machine. I believe it’s a Rivett 1030. Either way, huge meaty tools means huge meaty cuts, and this let me pop off a can in about an hour.

A modern production CNC lathe could probably knock one out in under 30 seconds.

Moving onto the threaded ring of wheel retaining (+1). I decided to be smart for once and ordered aluminum tube so I didn’t have to cut a big dish out from solid, then thread while risking crashing the tool into the bottom.

I went back to MITERS to do the threading part because the Old Mercedes, while a bit shaky for heavy metal removal, was more responsive and gave me better feedback for the sensitive threading operation.

I single-point machined the 2.5″-24 GYF threads using my cheesy internal threading tool. I’m getting pretty quick at it after discovering that it’s faster to reverse the machine to back the threading index up, than to wait for it to be driven all the way around again…

Leap of faith, again!

Well, two. The permanent side plates have already been installed in this picture. I’ve also fit the bearings in. They are the same 6902 type 15mm bore bearings I use on RazEr. I’ve moved away from the 6802s because of their stunning lack of curbhop durability.

I dropped a stator in for fun to see how things were fitting. At least the stator fits inside – this tells me I didn’t do too badly, right?

The removable side plate will wait until I install magnets in each rotor. Usually, some aspect of manufacturing means that the magnets sit a little higher or are a little thicker than I had anticipated – RazEr’s motor needed two trips back to the shop to actually seat properly inside the can rim.

While the Loctite was hardening, I cored out a 98mm Razor scooter wheel. The Deathblades will run 98mm wheels, which are about the largest found on common road skates. Motor torque scales with stator volume, so smaller wheels would mean even even even less torque.

(See? 3 even’s! It’s cubic! So is volume! Get it?!!)

After the coring…

…and with the threaded ring of wheel retaining installed. I have yet to drill the spanner wrench holes, and might just get lazy and Loctite the whole thing again.

But, that would be unprofessional.

Steps to go for 1 static display Deathblade:

  • Get the frame waterjet cut from 1/8″ aluminum, and braze it together
  • Epoxy the magnets
  • Make the other side plate to fit, times two
  • Make two shafts
  • Maybe wind the motor, but because of its nature, I might skip this step for the presentation.

Resisty Testing

Apr 21, 2010 in Stuff

Solve the resistor!

I dare you.

Project Deathblades: Turning up the Heat

Apr 14, 2010 in Project Build Reports, RazErBlades

Back in January, I first posted about Deathblades as a distraction from the January build season where I finished Cold Arbor. Since then, it has mostly been a background process. I put the anticipated motor parts in a box and sort of forgot about them for a while.

With the semester more than halfway over and the summer build season rapidly approaching, I went back to Deathblades and gave the project a little more thought. Armed with more background on how brushless motors actually worked, I began designing the skate motor around the salvaged copier stators.

Oh, yeah, back in late January, I put together an Instructable on building small hub motors. I’m a fan of intellectual property and product marketing propriety and all, but I also like DIY and individual engineering efforts. So, someone make my work useful and build a hub motor or something.

Let’s start with the basics. This layout is about the same thing I create for every 12 slot motor ever. Since I can have custom magnets made and delivered super-duper cheap, I have elected to skip fudging with flat magnets for now.  It’s just not worth the extra effort of making sure they’re all aligned when a full circle only costs a few dollars more.

I elected to keep the usual 0.5mm airgap and design in some 2mm thick 14-pole arc segments.

Altogether, RazEr’s motor is capable of cranking 4 or 5 Nm of torque, and it accelerates pretty well. I want to hit the same target with Deathblades, but since it will have 4 motors sharing that load, it should not be difficult. Average little dLRK motors like this seem to always have a torque constant of 0.2 to 0.3 Nm/A or so, provided you keep the turn count in the mid-double digits.

I discovered through 2.671 that NIBLR overestimates motor torque by about a third just due to the nonidealities that it overlooks. This is fine – I’ll just overspec the motor by 33% or so.

Leap of faith!!

Here’s revision 1 of the design, featuring the dual removable ring structure that I also designed into one variation of the RazEr motor.  The wheel is a 100mm skate wheel, specifically from the newest Razor scooters.  I chose them after taking dimensions from people around here who owned Razor scooters. They have a rather low tread profile compared to many 100mm skate wheels, which maximizes the motor diameter, and consequently torque.

Here’s a cross section of the design that I made for the Instructables page. The skewed hole in the center is for passing wires out of the motor. Otherwise, the lightest blue shade is the stator core, the medium blue is the ring of magnets, and the pink things are type 6902 ball bearings.

A

Another view of the motor, mostly assembled. I didn’t fill in any windings for this model, but left enough room in the endcap to account for them.

I elected to redesign the motor using the Compromise Solution I used for RazEr. I save on the part count, but the threading is a bit more difficult to pull off right.  Hopefully now that I’ve done one, I’ll be better at it.

Alright, enough about the motor. I’m satisfied with the motor for now, so I started on frame design. I had stated previously that each Deathblade will probably be two wheeled, as opposed to 4 or more wheels for the average road skate. That’s because I need the central cavity between the wheels for battery and controller volume.

That means I was essentially looking at a box with wheel-mounting flanges sticking out of it, and which has the original Rollerblade boot pattern on top.

Here’s the first-pass result.

The construction will be similar to Cold Arbor’s frame – slotted and tabbed aluminum plate that do not have additional fasteners. I’ll continue using the weird metallic hot glue method that is neither welding nor soldering.

I guess that makes it brazing? Whatever – Deathblade frames will be one-piece for maximum rigidity and strength.

But wait, how the heck am I going to put things in this one-piece chassis?

Well, for one, it will be open at the top. So it’s really a bucket with wheel mounting flanges and the skate’s bolt pattern on it. The above is a rendering of the whole assembly, which can really be strapped to anything – possibly even your arms or hands if you want to skate while doing a constant handstand.

Or perhaps invent some strange variant of street luging.

I kept the wheelbase the same as the original Rollerblade frame’s because I’ve gotten used to their span. That, and I need enough space to fit batteries inside. The blue prism is a geometric representation of a 4AH, 4 cell lithium polymer battery.

So when’s this thing going to be done? Probably not next week or anything, but I want one power unit built by the end of April.

RazEr: The MITburgring Ostschleife

Apr 01, 2010 in Project Build Reports, Project RazEr

It’s legit. Yet again!

Of course the first thing I did after making sure the motor worked was throwing it on RazEr. Then, over the past week, I have been beating the crap out of it by commuting everywhere – when I could. The weather has been abhorrent over the weekend.

I’m proud to say that everything has been working flawlessly. The scooter is almost excessively stealthy due to its low profile nature. When fully loaded, the motor makes a very attenuated “brushless whistle” that’s just enough to cause people in front of me to move out of the way instinctively, but they’re not really sure what on earth it is.

Well, until I fly by.

So let’s backtrack and see what happened.

Once again, I start with the finished product. Remounting the motor into the scooter was not a difficult affair, since the center hub and shaft was the same. Otherwise, it just involved hooking up a few wires again. It was nice to see something working after it had been sitting idly on a hook for a year.

Here’s a shot of the business end. Those side rails which form the wheelie bar have been around since the very first wheelmotor iteration!

It turns out that having the motor oriented towards the right side was not exactly a good design choice. I should have installed the can the other way – when torque is applied externally to this orientation, the wheel tries to unscrew the locking ring. This happened a few times in testing, so I ended up Loctiting the ring to the can threads.

Such a reversible process.

Here’s the important parts of the vehicle. If you have never seen this before, there are two 5AH LiPoly packs which form most of the belly volume. The remaining volume up front holds a big model airplane motor controller and a servo tester to convert an analog throttle voltage to R/C signal PWM.

Also, a bunch of LEDs.

Here’s a closeup of the flip side of the motor, the removable faceplate. Technically this should have been on the wire exit side, but it was 5 in the morning when I installed everything and I don’t feel like pulling it apart again.

This was actually the most fun part of the rebuild. I didn’t have another resistive throttle available, because they had all began malfunctioning. The cheapo servo tester I used actually doesn’t take a voltage and turn it into a pulse; it performs a timed discharge of a capacitor through a resistance. This was fine and all when the servo tester was used with the knob it came with, but it meant that I could only use a resistive method of interfacing the throttle. A standard cheap Hall Effect throttle puts out a voltage and won’t let a cap discharge through it.

So I did what any desperate engineer would do – I whipped up a slumthrottle out of some aluminum bits, a potentiometer, and a long extension spring used in torsion. It works better than it should. Using this, I recalibrated the throttle endpoints of the controller and also changed a few settings such as timing and startup.

With this, I went rocketing down the hallway a few times. Because I’m here writing this, you know it worked.

And boy did it work. Here’s the high score of the day, about 1,200 watts on a good launch. I’ve since pulled almost 1,400 by bringing my ‘kick start’ speed closer and closer to the controller’s minimum pickup speed.

The controller, being sensorless and aircraft-optimized, has a minimum speed below which it thinks the motor is stalled and will refuse to start. The “base speed” for Razer is about 5 miles per hour, below which the motor will not actually produce torque when commanded.

And here is RazEr after the “maiden IRL voyage” back at East Campus.

I’ve been using the scooter to commute every change I’ve gotten, just to put as many miles on it as possible. Nothing has yet broken, nor started shaking apart. I’ve been purposefully using sidewalks and cobblestone paved pathways whenever possible just to see what WOULD shake apart first, but the motor and other systems have remained steadfast.

The total mileage on this motor is probably 3 or 4 by now. A single cross campus trip consumes about 0.25 amp hours, and the longest trip so far has consumed 1.3 amp hours.

Here’s a Google map of the most recent “long haul”. I began with a cross campus round trip, then quickly followed with an continuous loop around the eastern half (third?) of campus. The distance was 1.89 miles, so given the 1.3 AH consumption, we can figure that RazEr has a “mileage” of about 25 watt hours per mile.

I’ll try to time a “campus loop” now that the weather is nicer. I’ve monikered the continuous strip of sidewalk and bike path bounded by Massachusetts Avenue, Vassar Street, Main Street, and Ames Street as the “MITburgring Ostschleife”, after the Nurburgring.